
Clearing the air: New science reveals that toking up may be more addictive than previously thought.
Although there’s a lot of buzz
about marijuana being nonaddictive, the evidence is stacking up that
people can — and do — become dependent on the drug. A study released earlier this year,
for example, found that 40 percent of marijuana users in an outpatient
treatment program showed signs of withdrawal, a classic indicator of
addiction. Now, new research in the journal PNAS sheds light on how lighting up changes the brain — and potentially primes people for withdrawal.
It’s long been known that exposure to THC,
the primary psychoactive ingredient in pot, can lead to changes in the
brain. Problem is, different studies have shown different structural
alterations, making it difficult to pinpoint exactly how the stuff
affects people mentally. That’s why a group of researchers decided to
use three different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques to
examine the brains of 48 chronic marijuana users and 62 nonusers, while
also assessing IQ and negative life consequences of pot smoking.
The most obvious difference: The
people who regularly toked up had less volume in the orbitofrontal
gyri. This brain region is part of the orbitofrontal cortex, “one of the
primary areas within the reward system, which is basically a network of
brain regions implicated in the addiction process,” said study author
Francesca Filbey, an addiction researcher at the Center for BrainHealth
at the University of Texas at Dallas. “More specifically, the
orbitofrontal cortex is important for decision-making. This is the area
of the brain that would learn something is good for us or bad for us.”
So why does pot cause shrinkage
in this area? Simple: The orbitofrontal cortex is highly concentrated
with cannabinoid receptors, the places in your brain where THC binds. As
a result, it’s much more vulnerable to the effects of a chronic flood
of the substance. In animal studies, “the number of those receptors
decreased as a result of THC exposure as a way to regain balance in that
system,” Filbey told Yahoo Health. “So too much THC basically leads to
lower numbers of those receptors in the brain.”
It’s this effect that gives
credence to the “pot is addictive” camp. As Filbey explained, the fewer
cannabinoid receptors a marijuana user has, the more THC he requires to
achieve the desired high. “This really describes tolerance,” she said.
“Around 10 percent of users, on average, report changes in tolerance and
also increased craving and withdrawal.” The marijuana users in this
study weren’t just casual smokers — they used the drug at least four
times per week.
Although this study may help
illuminate the addiction process, the findings are a little hazier when
it comes to how these brain changes affect people’s behavior and
intelligence, if at all. The researchers did find that marijuana users
scored lower on an IQ test than non-users did. But as tempting as it is
to link this to the changes in their brains, the researchers weren’t
able to firmly establish that connection, suggesting there’s another
factor behind the users’ lower IQs. One possibility: “If these
individuals were using during their adolescent years, then they may have
missed a lot of the verbal knowledge that IQ is testing for,” Filbey
said.
And, incredibly, the brain seems
capable of compensating for the volume loss associated with consistent
marijuana use: The pot smokers showed increased connectivity in the
orbitofrontal cortex. What does that mean, exactly? “Structural
connectivity refers to the actual white matter tracks that connect the
gray areas in our brain,” said Filbey. “Functional connectivity is how
well brain regions coactivate — if they respond synchronously. This
basically suggests there’s greater communication within the network.”
The positive effects on connectivity were greatest in people who’d
started using marijuana at a young age.
If this sounds too good to be
true, that’s because it is — at least if you’ve been toking up for
years. After about six years of chronic pot smoking, these compensatory
increases in connectivity began to reverse. “[Connectivity] actually
started to decline,” Filbey said. “[The brain] isn’t able to sustain
itself past continued use of about six years.”
No comments:
Post a Comment